{"id":11190,"date":"2022-12-22T10:40:40","date_gmt":"2022-12-22T07:40:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/?p=11190"},"modified":"2022-12-22T11:03:36","modified_gmt":"2022-12-22T08:03:36","slug":"ksc-wins-av-test-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/11190\/","title":{"rendered":"VPN’lerin Efendisi"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a>, Almanya\u2019n\u0131n Magdeburg kentinde bulunan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ara\u015ft\u0131rma kurulu\u015fu AV-TEST<\/a>\u2018in y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc herkese a\u00e7\u0131k VPN paketi sertifikasyon testlerine<\/a> \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ld\u0131r kat\u0131l\u0131yor ve bu y\u0131l \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc kez, \u201cOnayl\u0131 Sanal \u00d6zel A\u011f \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc<\/a>\u201d rozetini kazand\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u0130lgin\u00e7tir ki \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleri testlerin sonuna ula\u015f\u0131p sertifika alabilen kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n say\u0131s\u0131 giderek d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyor. \u00d6zellikle belirtmek gerekirse 2020<\/a> y\u0131l\u0131nda alt\u0131 VPN paketi varken bu say\u0131 2021<\/a>\u2018de \u00fc\u00e7e, bu y\u0131l<\/a> ise ikiye d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Bu iki kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131: Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a> ve Norton Secure VPN (bu da akla \u201c\u0130sko\u00e7yal\u0131\u201d filminin me\u015fhur repli\u011fini getiriyor: \u201cSadece bir tane olabilir\u201d). Bunun nedeni, herkese a\u00e7\u0131k sertifikasyon testlerine giren kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n, sonu\u00e7lardan memnun olmamalar\u0131 veya sertifikasyon gerekliliklerini kar\u015f\u0131lamamalar\u0131 halinde sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131n\u0131 istememeleri olabilir.<\/p>\n

Bu sertifikasyon testinde, VPN kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 etkileyen bir\u00e7ok fakt\u00f6r de\u011ferlendirilir: Kullan\u0131labilirlik, i\u015fletim sistemine uygunluk, sunucu konumlar\u0131, y\u00fckleme ve indirme h\u0131zlar\u0131, g\u00fcvenlik, \u015feffafl\u0131k vb. Bizler, VPN \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcm\u00fcz\u00fcn sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 stabilite ve g\u00fcvenlik seviyesi konusunda kendimizden emindik. Bu nedenle de en \u00e7ok ilgimizi \u00e7eken nokta, piyasadaki di\u011fer VPN \u00fcr\u00fcnleriyle yap\u0131lan ek performans kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 oldu. Bu durumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurarak, herkese a\u00e7\u0131k sertifikasyon testi ba\u015flamadan \u00f6nce AV-TEST\u2019ten, herkese a\u00e7\u0131k sertifikasyon performans\u0131 testine<\/a> paralel olarak alt\u0131 adet ek VPN \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc, bu metodolojiye tamamen uygun \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirmesini istedik. Sonu\u00e7 olarak da kapsaml\u0131 performans kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma raporu<\/a> yay\u0131mland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 sa\u011flanan VPN\u2019ler hem indirme hem y\u00fckleme performanslar\u0131, torrent indirme performans\u0131, YouTube yay\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 ve ABD West Coast, Hollanda ve Japonya olmak \u00fczere \u00fc\u00e7 farkl\u0131 co\u011frafyada \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclen gecikme s\u00fcresi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan test edildi. T\u00fcm testler \u201cen iyi\u201d yerel ba\u011flant\u0131 ve iki adet yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7in ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi. Herkese a\u00e7\u0131k sertifikasyon testinde yaln\u0131zca bir fark vard\u0131: Test edilen \u00fcr\u00fcnlerden hi\u00e7birisinin elde etti\u011fi sonu\u00e7lar kapsam d\u0131\u015f\u0131 tutulmad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Muhte\u015fem Yedili \u015fu \u015fekildeydi: Avast SecureLine VPN, ExpressVPN, Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a>, Mullvad VPN, NordVPN, Norton Secure VPN ve Private Internet Access.<\/p>\n

AV-TEST, t\u00fcm \u00fcr\u00fcnlere paralel olarak bu testi bir hafta boyunca g\u00fcnde birka\u00e7 kez yapt\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylece, performans testi sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortalamas\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131. \u015eimdi bu rakamlara bir bakal\u0131m ve modern VPN \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlerinin, eski g\u00fcnlerdeki \u00e7evirmeli eri\u015fim veya ADSL\u2019yi nas\u0131l ge\u00e7ti\u011fini g\u00f6relim.<\/p>\n

H\u0131z Testi veya Git-Gel<\/h2>\n

G\u00fcnl\u00fck hayattaki VPN kullan\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n bir\u00e7o\u011funda indirme h\u0131z\u0131 y\u00fckleme h\u0131z\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nemli olsa da, tam kapsaml\u0131 bir testte her ikisinin de analiz edilmesi gerekir. Performans testinde, Microsoft Azure bulutta bulunan sanal makine yap\u0131land\u0131rmalar\u0131 kullan\u0131ld\u0131 ve t\u00fcm \u00fcr\u00fcnler varsay\u0131lan yap\u0131land\u0131rmalar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. \u0130nan\u0131n bana, bu sanal makinelerin internet ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 son derece<\/em> iyi ve \u00e7ok ama \u00e7ok<\/em> h\u0131zl\u0131yd\u0131; \u015fifresiz indirme ve y\u00fckleme h\u0131zlar\u0131 9 Gbps\u2019ye ula\u015f\u0131yordu. Evet, saniyedeki giga<\/strong><\/em>bit<\/strong> de\u011feri!<\/p>\n

\u0130ndirme, y\u00fckleme ve gecikme s\u00fcresi performanslar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ilk testler, \u201cend\u00fcstri standard\u0131\u201d olan Ookla LLC speedtest.net komut dizisi uygulamas\u0131 kullan\u0131larak yap\u0131ld\u0131 ve \u015fifresiz bir referans h\u0131z ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi \u00fczere bu testlerin t\u00fcm\u00fc hem yerel hem yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 konumlar i\u00e7in y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu testlerde, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n d\u00f6rt bir yan\u0131nda web\u2019de anonim \u015fekilde ne kadar h\u0131zl\u0131 s\u00f6rf yap\u0131labilece\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu.<\/p>\n

\"Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma<\/a>

Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma testi yerel ve yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ba\u011flant\u0131lar haritas\u0131<\/p><\/div>\n

Teknolojinin yap\u0131s\u0131 gere\u011fi, VPN kullanmak neredeyse her zaman performans\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki grafikte de g\u00fcvensiz ba\u011flant\u0131ya k\u0131yasla h\u0131zda ciddi bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcyoruz. Bu da anonim olman\u0131n bedelidir. Ancak d\u00fcr\u00fcst olmak gerekirse bu de\u011ferleri internet hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131n\u0131z\u0131n sundu\u011fu bant geni\u015fli\u011fiyle k\u0131yaslad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda, ba\u011flant\u0131n\u0131z daha yava\u015f oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in h\u0131zda bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f g\u00f6remezsiniz.<\/p>\n

\"\u015eifresiz<\/a>

\u015eifresiz indirme ve y\u00fckleme performanslar\u0131na ili\u015fkin kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131 yerel ve yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 sonu\u00e7lar\u0131, ayr\u0131ca test edilen \u00fc\u00e7 konum i\u00e7in sekt\u00f6r ortalamalar\u0131 (ne kadar \u00e7ok, o kadar iyi)<\/p><\/div>\n

Ancak, \u201cortalama performans\u201d de\u011feri istatistik ve kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan faydal\u0131 olsa da, g\u00fcnl\u00fck ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131zda \u201cortalama bir \u015fey\u201d kullanmay\u0131 tercih etmezsiniz. \u00d6yleyse gelin, t\u00fcm test kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n ne kadar h\u0131zl\u0131 oldu\u011funa bakal\u0131m ve kazananlar ile di\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndaki dikkate de\u011fer fark\u0131 g\u00f6relim:<\/p>\n

\"Yerel<\/a>

Yerel ve yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 VPN sunucular\u0131na ili\u015fkin indirme ve y\u00fckleme performanslar\u0131n\u0131n birle\u015fik ortalamalar\u0131 (ne kadar \u00e7ok, o kadar iyi)<\/p><\/div>\n

Kaspersky<\/a> neredeyse t\u00fcm yar\u0131\u015flar\u0131 kazand\u0131. Tek istisna, yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 y\u00fckleme ortalama performans\u0131yd\u0131. Bu yar\u0131\u015f\u0131n kaybedilmesinin sebebi ise test s\u0131ras\u0131nda giderilmemi\u015f olan yamas\u0131z bir sunucu sorunuydu.<\/p>\n

Bulutlarda Gecikme S\u00fcresi<\/h2>\n

\u2013 Ne istiyoruz?<\/em>
\n\u2013 Ne zaman?<\/em>
\n\u2013 Gecikmesiz oyun oynamak!<\/em>
\n\u2013 Hemen \u015fimdi!<\/em><\/p>\n

Oyun oynamay\u0131 sevenler i\u00e7in ping s\u00fcresi \u00e7ok \u00f6nemlidir. Ping s\u00fcresi \u00e7ok yava\u015fsa oyuncu ne kadar h\u0131zl\u0131 tepki verirse versin, gecikme s\u00fcresi nedeniyle bu tepkiler oyuna h\u0131zl\u0131 ula\u015fmaz. Herkese a\u00e7\u0131k sertifikasyon testinde Kaspersky VPN<\/a>, Norton Secure VPN\u2019in ortalama gecikme s\u00fcresi olan 13 milisaniyeye k\u0131yasla, t\u00fcm konumlarda 5,3 milisaniyelik bir ortalama yerel gecikme s\u00fcresi g\u00f6sterdi (\u0130\u015fte! Kaybettiniz)<\/em>. Kapsaml\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma testinde<\/a> ise yerel gecikme s\u00fcresi alan\u0131nda Mullvad VPN\u2019den hemen sonra NordVPN ile ikincili\u011fi payla\u015farak VPN\u2019lerin sekt\u00f6r ortalamas\u0131n\u0131 geride b\u0131rakt\u0131. Yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 gecikme s\u00fcresi testinde, VPN \u00fcr\u00fcnlerine ve \u015fifresiz referanslara k\u0131yasla kayda de\u011fer bir fark g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi.<\/p>\n

Karanl\u0131ktaki asalaklar<\/h2>\n

Gizlili\u011fe en \u00e7ok nerede de\u011fer veririz? Tabii ki eski torrent\u2019lerde. Bu nedenle de VPN t\u00fcnelinden ge\u00e7i\u015f h\u0131z\u0131, t\u00fcm torrent severler i\u00e7in kritik \u00f6nem arz eder. Bu testte, bir torrent\u2019i indirme i\u015fleminin ba\u015flamas\u0131 ile torrent dosyas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc taraf bir torrent istemcisi \u00fczerinden sabit diske yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n

\"Torrent<\/a>

Torrent indirme h\u0131zlar\u0131n\u0131n birle\u015fik ortalamalar\u0131 (ne kadar \u00e7ok, o kadar iyi).
* Norton Secure VPN, test edilen sunucularda torrent\u2019leri desteklememektedir<\/p><\/div>\n

Burada da yine, hem yerel hem yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 torrent ge\u00e7i\u015fleri i\u00e7in galip gelen \u00fcr\u00fcn Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a> oldu.<\/p>\n

Borular Patl\u0131yor<\/h2>\n

Hepimiz Netflix\u2019i \u00e7ok seviyoruz. Yay\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 hizmetleri son zamanlarda olduk\u00e7a pop\u00fcler ve en \u00e7ok internet trafi\u011fini de bunlar yarat\u0131yor. Konum engelleme ile kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131 en \u00e7ok rahats\u0131z edenler de bu yay\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 hizmetleri ama neyse ki bunlar VPN ile atlat\u0131labiliyor! Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, VPN kullan\u0131larak kare kayb\u0131 ve gecikme olmaks\u0131z\u0131n izlenen stabil bir yay\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 son derece \u00f6nemli bir rol oynuyor. Siz sinefiller i\u00e7in iyi bir haberimiz var: Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a> ve test edilen di\u011fer t\u00fcm \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmler, 4K yay\u0131n testini kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n fark etmeyece\u011fi kadar k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck sorunlarla ge\u00e7ti (birka\u00e7 kare d\u00fc\u015fmesi ve milisaniyelik gecikmeler bu sorunlara \u00f6rnek verilebilir).<\/p>\n

Tepenin \u00dcst\u00fc, Tepenin Alt\u0131<\/h2>\n

Fakat performansa ek olarak, herkese a\u00e7\u0131k sertifikasyon testinde test edilen di\u011fer \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlerin ba\u015fka parametrelerini de kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmak gerekir. Norton Secure VPN\u2019e k\u0131yasla, OpenVPN protokol\u00fcn\u00fc kullanan Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a> daha fazla i\u015fletim sistemini destekliyor (Linux, ChromeOS, AndroidTV ve FireTV dahil), \u00fc\u00e7 kat daha fazla sunucu konumuna sahip (90 \u2013 29) ve t\u00fcm \u015feffafl\u0131k testlerinde ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 oldu. Ancak as\u0131l kritik nokta \u015fu ki, Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a> t\u00fcm g\u00fcvenlik testlerinde s\u0131zmalara kar\u015f\u0131 kusursuz performans g\u00f6sterirken, Norton Secure VPN yeniden ba\u011flant\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda DNS s\u0131z\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131na izin vererek cihaz\u0131n DNS sorgular\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli\u011fine a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u015eeffafl\u0131k \u00e7ok de\u011ferli bir \u015feydir<\/h2>\n

\u015eeffafl\u0131k ve gizlilik s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda Kaspersky, m\u00fc\u015fterilerinin mahremiyetini<\/a> son derece ciddiye al\u0131r: Bu \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm gerekenden fazla veri toplamaz, toplad\u0131\u011f\u0131 verileri g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almak i\u00e7in en y\u00fcksek sekt\u00f6r standartlar\u0131na uygun hareket eder, \u015firket d\u00fczenli aral\u0131klarla denetlenir ve \u015feffafl\u0131k raporlar\u0131<\/a> yay\u0131mlar.<\/p>\n

\u00dcr\u00fcn g\u00fcvenli\u011fi, Bug Bounty Program da dahil olmak \u00fczere Kaspersky\u2019nin g\u00fcvenlik a\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6netim ve a\u00e7\u0131klama program\u0131yla sa\u011flan\u0131r.\u00a0Kaspersky ayn\u0131 zamanda, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n d\u00f6rt bir yan\u0131ndaki \u015eeffafl\u0131k Merkezlerinin olu\u015fturulmas\u0131nda da \u00f6nc\u00fc olarak bilinir. Bu merkezler, \u015firketin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlerinin g\u00fcvenli\u011finin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirilmesini sa\u011flar.<\/p>\n

Son Sahne<\/h2>\n

Yap\u0131lan h\u0131z testlerinin bir\u00e7o\u011funda e\u015fsiz performans g\u00f6steren Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a>, performans testinde genel olarak test edilen en h\u0131zl\u0131 VPN \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcd\u00fcr ve test kategorilerinin bir\u00e7o\u011funda birinci olmu\u015ftur. Hem yerel hem de yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 senaryolarda ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc indirme ve torrent h\u0131z\u0131 performanslar\u0131 g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm, \u00f6zellikle yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 veri iletiminde di\u011fer kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n en az iki kat\u0131 performans g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a> yerel y\u00fckleme testinde lider \u00fcr\u00fcnd\u00fcr; sonu\u00e7lar\u0131, sekt\u00f6r ortalamas\u0131n\u0131n iki kat\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u00d6l\u00e7\u00fclen gecikme s\u00fcresi, test edilen t\u00fcm \u00fcr\u00fcnler aras\u0131nda ilk \u00fc\u00e7te yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer t\u00fcm \u00fcr\u00fcnler gibi Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a> da yerel veya yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ba\u011flant\u0131dan 4K video oynat\u0131rken hi\u00e7bir sorunla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yamas\u0131z yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 sunucularla ilgili problem \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, \u015fu anda ortalaman\u0131n alt\u0131nda olan yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 y\u00fckleme performans\u0131n\u0131n da ciddi anlamda iyile\u015fece\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir. Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection<\/a> t\u00fcm testleri ba\u015far\u0131yla ge\u00e7mi\u015f ve \u201cOnayl\u0131 Sanal \u00d6zel A\u011f \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc<\/a>\u00bb rozetini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n


\n\u00a0
\nSon olarak, rakamlara bakmay\u0131 seviyorsan\u0131z her iki raporun da PDF haline buradan<\/a> ve buradan <\/a>mutlaka g\u00f6z atmal\u0131s\u0131n\u0131z. Bu raporlarda ho\u015funuza gidecek \u00e7ok say\u0131 bulacaks\u0131n\u0131z.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z IT g\u00fcvenlik ara\u015ft\u0131rma kurulu\u015fu AV-TEST taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen VPN performans\u0131, gizlilik ve \u015feffafl\u0131k testlerinde a\u00e7\u0131k ara galip gelmi\u015f ve s\u00f6z konusu kurulu\u015fun \u201cOnayl\u0131 Sanal \u00d6zel A\u011f \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc\u201d olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2706,"featured_media":11193,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[994,1287,1285],"tags":[865,550,762,2601],"class_list":{"0":"post-11190","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-privacy","8":"category-news","9":"category-products","10":"tag-av-test","11":"tag-siber-guvenlik","12":"tag-vpn","13":"tag-yarismanin-galibi"},"hreflang":[{"hreflang":"tr","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/11190\/"},{"hreflang":"en-in","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.co.in\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/24983\/"},{"hreflang":"en-ae","url":"https:\/\/me-en.kaspersky.com\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/20478\/"},{"hreflang":"ar","url":"https:\/\/me.kaspersky.com\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/10351\/"},{"hreflang":"en-us","url":"https:\/\/usa.kaspersky.com\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/27551\/"},{"hreflang":"en-gb","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.co.uk\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/25313\/"},{"hreflang":"es-mx","url":"https:\/\/latam.kaspersky.com\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/25624\/"},{"hreflang":"es","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.es\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/28203\/"},{"hreflang":"it","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.it\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/27455\/"},{"hreflang":"x-default","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/46586\/"},{"hreflang":"fr","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.fr\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/19894\/"},{"hreflang":"pt-br","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.br\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/20484\/"},{"hreflang":"de","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.de\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/29604\/"},{"hreflang":"ja","url":"https:\/\/blog.kaspersky.co.jp\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/33008\/"},{"hreflang":"nl","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.nl\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/28683\/"},{"hreflang":"en-au","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.au\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/31359\/"},{"hreflang":"en-za","url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.co.za\/blog\/ksc-wins-av-test-2022\/31062\/"}],"acf":[],"banners":"","maintag":{"url":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/tag\/av-test\/","name":"AV-TEST"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2706"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11190"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11190\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11211,"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11190\/revisions\/11211"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kaspersky.com.tr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}